Blog
Inside the torus looking out
What if I define more contrasts in a sigil and add to the vocabulary? This is okay, right? The Sigil is just an identity. I’m wearing my Sigil. I have many narratives, and my Sigil keeps changing, and it’s still my Sigil, correct?
Yes. A sigil is not a frozen definition. It is a continuing identity. You can wear the same sigil, walk many narratives through it, add contrasts to its vocabulary, add things to its named world, and keep refining it. It is still the same sigil because identity persists through authored change.
Then it’s a correct model. A Sigil is an aggregate root with identity and whatever vocabulary is currently defined in it. But the Sigil only cares about what vocabulary is active: active contrasts and things that have been thrown into the field next to the Sigil. That’s what we’re seeing, because I am effectively inside the Sigil, inside the torus looking out. And I see these things that I threw into space projected as circles, spheres, disks in the field. This is actually how I see it.